Hangar’s Sala Ricson has hosted the second opening of the AION programme, held on 6 November, seeking to add a new conceptual layer to the collaborative research process, after the initial research, autoethnography and joint work of the tandems, and the Cabinet of Errors and Uncertainties. <\/p>\n\n
The session began with the talk “Creativity as indiscipline”<\/em> by Agust\u00ed Nieto-Gal\u00e1n, professor of History of Science and researcher “ICREA Acad\u00e8mia” (2009, 2018, 2023) at the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), who has written extensively on the history of science in the eighteenth-twentieth centuries, the urban history of science and the historical analysis of the relations between science and politics in the twentieth century. He has recently finished editing a collective volume on the construction of ignorance (agnotology) in twentieth-century Spain. <\/p>\n\n In his speech, Nieto-Gal\u00e1n gave examples of theorists who have placed themselves in liminal disciplinary spaces, sometimes ambiguous or rebellious: from Ludwik Fleck’s esoteric and exoteric circles, Thomas Kuhn’s paradigm theory, or Thomas Gieryn’s concept of boundary-work <\/em>. During his speech, he also referred to the biologist Rachel Carson and the philosopher Sandra Harding. The talk highlighted those practices and thinkers who have placed themselves at the limits of knowledge; how disciplinary negotiation defines the margins of science; the need to dialogue expert and non-expert knowledge and learn to navigate the boundaries of what is considered right or wrong; the role of activism and resistance as spaces for negotiation and creativity, or the complexity that emerges when disciplines are diluted… <\/p>\n\n Subsequently, a space has been opened to think collectively about how to operationalize error and uncertainty, and about how both elements can become methodological and creative tools. A complex exercise that puts on the table many questions, new ideas and recurring reflections that feed the body of knowledge in AION’s research process: the negotiation of temporalities; who and how errors are defined; serendipity, inefficiency and inefficiency; the materialities that are generated and that are needed to operate with these engines; the relational component of error and uncertainty or the need to generate spaces to share and encourage uncertainty, among others. <\/p>\n\n Participants in this session were: Markus Teller, Margherita Gallano, Pedro Torres, Lara Campos, tere badia, Agust\u00ed Nieto-Gal\u00e1n, Guillem Serrahima Andrea Olmedo, N\u00faria Vall\u00e8s, Zoila Babot, Colectivo Juan de Madre, Jara Rocha, Monica Rikic, Lydia Sanmart\u00ed, Markel Cormenzana, Blanca Buendia, Daniel Pitarch, Pau Artigas, Monica Seglar, Clara Laguillo, Tatiana Afanador, Antonio Ganglio, Joan Guillem Mayans, Andreu Belsunces, Laia Allegro, Anna Pinotti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":9576,"parent":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"categories":[109],"tags":[121],"destacat":[],"class_list":["post-9578","actualitat","type-actualitat","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-projects","tag-research"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n